results somewhat done, I guess

Doc/main.tex

@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
     $N$ is the total amount of samples.
 
 
-  \subsection{Ripple characteristics}
+  \subsection{Ripple characteristics} \label{section:ripple}
     \begin{Figure}
       \centering
       \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{RIPPLE.png}
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
     preparing the signal for the FFT.
 
 
-  \subsection{Start up}
+  \subsection{Start up} \label{section:start_up}
     The last characteristics is the start up, specifically the different rise times
     under load. The voltage was measured at the output as the supply was turned on.
 
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
     discussed, as well as discuss some probable causes for unknown or unintended 
     results.
 
-    
+
   \subsection{Efficiency}
     \begin{Figure}
       \centering
@@ -176,14 +176,14 @@
     an unexplained jump back to a higher percentage.
 
 
-  \subsection{Noise}
+  \subsection{Noise} \label{section:result_noise}
     \begin{Figure}
       \centering
       \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{SNR_LOADVSPKPK.jpg}
       \captionof{figure}{WIP}
       \label{fig:noise_pkpk}
     \end{Figure}
-    \noindent The results for the efficiency measurements, as described in section 
+    \noindent The results for the noise measurements, as described in section 
     \ref{section:peak_to_peak} are displayed in figure \ref{fig:noise_pkpk}.
     The peak to peak voltage is a significant fraction of the output voltage,
     with $3V$ peaking at $33\%$. It seems there is a relation between peak to
@@ -196,13 +196,85 @@
       \captionof{figure}{WIP}
       \label{fig:noise_sd}
     \end{Figure}
-    \noindent The results for the efficiency measurements, as described in section 
+    \noindent The results for the noise measurements, as described in section 
     \ref{section:standard_devation} are displayed in figure \ref{fig:noise_sd}.
-    Although the voltage peaks are high, the noise's standard deviation is in the
+    Although the voltage peaks are high, the standard deviation of the noise is 
-    range of millivolts. The trend that a higher output voltage has more noise
+    in the range of millivolts. The trend that a higher output voltage has more 
-    is continued in this graph.
+    noise is continued in this graph.
+
 
   \subsection{Ripple}
+    \begin{Figure}
+      \centering
+      \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{RIPPLE_LOADVSPKPK.jpg}
+      \captionof{figure}{WIP}
+      \label{fig:ripple_pkpk}
+    \end{Figure}
+    \noindent The results for the ripple measurements, as described in section 
+    \ref{section:ripple} are displayed in figure \ref{fig:ripple_pkpk}. The 
+    voltage level in the graph  seems to confirm that the peak to peak noise, 
+    seen in section \ref{section:result_noise} is caused by the ripple. 
+
+    \begin{Figure}
+      \centering
+      \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{RIPPLE_LOADVSFREQ.jpg}
+      \captionof{figure}{WIP}
+      \label{fig:ripple_freq}
+    \end{Figure}
+    \noindent The frequency of the ripple is roughly $38 MHz$ and independant of
+    the load. To figure out if this ripple is caused by the combination of the 
+    inductor and the capactitor the following equation can be used.
+    \begin{equation}
+      f = \frac{1}{2 \pi \sqrt{LC}}
+    \end{equation}
+    Using the values from figure \ref{fig:schematic_full}, the resonating frequency
+    of the circuit should be around $27KHz$. Thus, this cannot be the cause of
+    the high frequency. As the frequency of the ripple is magnitudes higher
+    than the LC-circuit's resosonant frequency, what is seen is most likely the
+    Self Resonating Frequency (SRF) of the inductor. Typically the SRF is
+    $>10 MHz$, so that could be a probable source of the high frequencies.
+    
+    \subsection{Start Up}
+    \begin{Figure}
+      \centering
+      \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{TRANSIENT_RISE_10_MA.jpg}
+      \captionof{figure}{WIP}
+      \label{fig:start_10}
+    \end{Figure}
+    
+    \begin{Figure}
+      \centering
+      \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{TRANSIENT_RISE_50_MA.jpg}
+      \captionof{figure}{WIP}
+      \label{fig:start_50}
+    \end{Figure}
+
+    \begin{center}
+    \captionof{table}{$10 mA$}
+    \label{table:start_10}
+    \begin{tabular}{llll}
+    Metric  & $\tau$ & $2\tau$ & Rise time \\
+    Percentage [$\%$] & 63 & 95 & 90 \\
+    Time [$s$] & 0.031 & 0.075 & 0.053 \\
+    \end{tabular}
+    \end{center}
+    
+    \begin{center} 
+    \captionof{table}{$50 mA$}
+    \label{table:start_50}
+    \begin{tabular}{llll}
+    Metric  & $\tau$ & $2\tau$ & Rise time \\
+    Percentage [$\%$] & 63 & 95 & 90 \\
+    Time [$s$] & 0.033 & 0.048 & 0.043 \\
+    \end{tabular}
+    \end{center}
+    
+    \noindent The results for the start up  measurements, as described in section 
+    \ref{section:start_up} are displayed in figure \ref{fig:start_10} and 
+    \ref{fig:start_50}, and table \ref{table:start_10} and \ref{table:start_50}.
+
+    Counterintuitively, the rise time is shorter with a higher load. 
+      
 
   \section{Conclusion}
   \lipsum[3-4]